<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MWSF 2004</title>
	<link>http://wordparts.com/2004/01/08/mwsf-2004/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: adam</title>
		<link>http://wordparts.com/2004/01/08/mwsf-2004/#comment-170</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordparts.com/2004/01/08/mwsf-2004/#comment-170</guid>
					<description>Here's another point about the iPod mini - if they priced it any lower than $249, it would remove some incentive (not to mention profits) to buy the $499 iPod. If you look at Apple products with multiple price points (powerbooks, G5s, iPods) you will almost always see this:
Top of the line product costs $x
Bottom line product costs $1/2x

So the cost of the iPod mini is just keeping with Apple's previous pricing strategy. I think Apple is going to keep the $250-$500 cost structure for as long as they can. I don't expect them to drop the price below $249, instead they'll just release say an 8-10GB mini for the same price 6-12 months from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another point about the iPod mini - if they priced it any lower than $249, it would remove some incentive (not to mention profits) to buy the $499 iPod. If you look at Apple products with multiple price points (powerbooks, G5s, iPods) you will almost always see this:<br />
Top of the line product costs $x<br />
Bottom line product costs $1/2x</p>
<p>So the cost of the iPod mini is just keeping with Apple&#8217;s previous pricing strategy. I think Apple is going to keep the $250-$500 cost structure for as long as they can. I don&#8217;t expect them to drop the price below $249, instead they&#8217;ll just release say an 8-10GB mini for the same price 6-12 months from now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grady Haynes</title>
		<link>http://wordparts.com/2004/01/08/mwsf-2004/#comment-171</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordparts.com/2004/01/08/mwsf-2004/#comment-171</guid>
					<description>I definitely agree that the mini is partially an upsell. At the movie theater, you could buy a 16 oz. soda for $3.49, why not buy the 64 oz. for $4.99?? Apple's not shedding any tears if you decide to buy the regular iPod.

Apple has a long history of bringing out products at a higher price, especially those that involve new technology/components, and then dropping them after a few months. The most apropos example I can think of is the original iPod which they dropped from $399 to $299 when they released higher capacity models.

The Cube dropped from $1799 to $1299 over its lifetime, I believe -- though that was due to poor sales.

I'm sure they know that the iPod mini would appeal to a much wider group of people at $199 -- that seems to be the number that most everyone is throwing out as &quot;I'd buy it if it were just $x&quot;. My guess is that they know that and want to get it there soon (much of the reason for iPod mini is likely long-term market share rather than immediate profit), but there's no reason to do that until the component prices drop and they've gotten the extra $50 of profit out of the early adopters. And that's where most commentators and I differ. I think there will be plenty of buyers sustaining $249 iPod mini sales for at least the few months until they drop the price to $199.

Time will tell; thanks for the comments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree that the mini is partially an upsell. At the movie theater, you could buy a 16 oz. soda for $3.49, why not buy the 64 oz. for $4.99?? Apple&#8217;s not shedding any tears if you decide to buy the regular iPod.</p>
<p>Apple has a long history of bringing out products at a higher price, especially those that involve new technology/components, and then dropping them after a few months. The most apropos example I can think of is the original iPod which they dropped from $399 to $299 when they released higher capacity models.</p>
<p>The Cube dropped from $1799 to $1299 over its lifetime, I believe &#8212; though that was due to poor sales.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they know that the iPod mini would appeal to a much wider group of people at $199 &#8212; that seems to be the number that most everyone is throwing out as &#8220;I&#8217;d buy it if it were just $x&#8221;. My guess is that they know that and want to get it there soon (much of the reason for iPod mini is likely long-term market share rather than immediate profit), but there&#8217;s no reason to do that until the component prices drop and they&#8217;ve gotten the extra $50 of profit out of the early adopters. And that&#8217;s where most commentators and I differ. I think there will be plenty of buyers sustaining $249 iPod mini sales for at least the few months until they drop the price to $199.</p>
<p>Time will tell; thanks for the comments.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
