<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monty Python&#8217;s Flying Creationism</title>
	<link>http://wordparts.com/2005/10/27/monty-pythons-flying-creationism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://wordparts.com/2005/10/27/monty-pythons-flying-creationism/#comment-20026</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordparts.com/2005/10/27/monty-pythons-flying-creationism/#comment-20026</guid>
					<description>You know, I believe in God, I believe He created all this, but even I have a problem with people pushing Intelligent Design as a Science curriculum.

It seems dishonest to me, calling something a Science when it is clearly a philosophical, theological world view.

How ironic and sad that Christian people, who are supposedly all about truth, would try to trick people into accepting this as a scientific position.

Creationism didn't make it into the schools so now we call it &quot;Intelligent Design&quot;?

I just don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I believe in God, I believe He created all this, but even I have a problem with people pushing Intelligent Design as a Science curriculum.</p>
<p>It seems dishonest to me, calling something a Science when it is clearly a philosophical, theological world view.</p>
<p>How ironic and sad that Christian people, who are supposedly all about truth, would try to trick people into accepting this as a scientific position.</p>
<p>Creationism didn&#8217;t make it into the schools so now we call it &#8220;Intelligent Design&#8221;?</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t get it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
